Does Sherlock account for staking compounds / underfills?

Frequently asked questions related to the installation and use of Sherlock. This forum is moderated.
Post Reply
Craig Hillman
DfR Staff Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 27 Mar 2013, 09:11
Contact:

Does Sherlock account for staking compounds / underfills?

Post by Craig Hillman » 03 Apr 2013, 13:10

How does Sherlock account for staking compounds / underfills?

The effect of staking compounds and underfills is being assessed through our SBIR Partnership Program and will be implemented into Sherlock at the completion of this project. For more information on our SBIR Partnership Program, please contact us at sales@dfrsolutions.com.

cflanders
Sherlock User
Posts: 12
Joined: 06 Jun 2013, 15:24

Re: Does Sherlock account for staking compounds / underfills

Post by cflanders » 23 Sep 2013, 21:48

Will this cover banks of components which are epoxied together?
(i.e. a capacitor bank with epoxy holding the bank together)

Top view example:
|Cap1|
|epoxy|
|Cap2|
|epoxy|
|Cap3|
|epoxy|
|Cap4|

thanks

User avatar
Nathan Blattau
Site Admin
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Mar 2013, 16:40
Location: Beltsville, Maryland
Contact:

Re: Does Sherlock account for staking compounds / underfills

Post by Nathan Blattau » 24 Sep 2013, 22:45

Yes, we are planning to add the ability to stake components together. The FEA implementation of this is under development.

Best regards,
Nathan Blattau, PhD
Senior Vice President
DfR Solutions, LLC
9000 Virginia Manor Rd, Ste 290
Beltsville MD 20705

Post Reply